|
Post by ©orporal Hicks™ on Sept 8, 2005 12:50:02 GMT -5
just vote and say why you would like it to be the time limit you had said
|
|
|
Post by thekgbisafteryou on Sept 8, 2005 14:41:57 GMT -5
i like 72 hours because it gives you more time to show what you can do.
|
|
|
Post by Socom on Sept 8, 2005 15:03:16 GMT -5
I say 42 hours becuase 72 hours is to long.
|
|
|
Post by Hardcore King on Sept 8, 2005 15:15:17 GMT -5
i say 48 hours
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on Sept 8, 2005 15:27:34 GMT -5
I say 48hrs is long enough.
|
|
|
Post by Kàšøn™ on Sept 8, 2005 15:29:48 GMT -5
48 is enough
|
|
|
Post by Matt Hardy on Sept 8, 2005 18:42:47 GMT -5
96
|
|
|
Post by thekgbisafteryou on Sept 8, 2005 18:59:26 GMT -5
96 is way to long.
|
|
|
Post by Kàšøn™ on Sept 8, 2005 19:26:32 GMT -5
yes, Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to long
|
|
|
Post by Warrior on Sept 8, 2005 20:59:17 GMT -5
48 hours - 72 hour becuase of time differences
|
|
|
Post by Fuzzy Penguin on Sept 9, 2005 2:53:13 GMT -5
48 hrs. If you are in the CWF, you have to be on regularly in matches, so it wouldnt make tht much of s difference.
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles95 on Sept 9, 2005 11:26:50 GMT -5
I think 48 for Wednesday Shows and 96 for PPVs
|
|
|
Post by ©orporal Hicks™ on Sept 9, 2005 11:36:43 GMT -5
ok it seems from what i have seen 48hrs is in the lead but what else im thinking is that PPV matchs go on for 72 hrs and reqular Warzone (or whatever it will be) will have a 48 hr time limit how does this sound for you guys
|
|
|
Post by ajstyles95 on Sept 9, 2005 11:55:42 GMT -5
yea its good the old time limit but better 96 for ppvs so can make a classic
|
|
|
Post by ©orporal Hicks™ on Sept 9, 2005 12:53:21 GMT -5
well its up to the votes not me im doing this for the members
|
|